How many of your intentional problems did the AI reviewer catch?
- All problems except 1 were catched
How many did it miss? Do the misses share a pattern (e.g., all subtle, all in a specific file type)?
Missed a problem in a file that was moved and had a wrong change:
Were there any false positives - comments about things that weren't actually problems?
- No
Did the severity levels match how serious the problems actually were?
- Yes
How actionable were the comments? Could you fix the issue based on the comment alone?
- Yes Would be good that when clicking on file from review, user will be redirected to the Editor to fix this issue
- Did the AI correctly identify which issues you fixed?
- Yes
- Did it incorrectly resolve any issues you left broken?
- No
- Did it miss any fixes you made?
- No
- How confident are you in the verification after this test?
- Very confident
- Did the numbers on the analytics page match your experience? Yes
- What would you add or change about the page?
- Add a refresh button or keep state after refresh (deep linking for selected project?)
- Was it clear whether the AI review was in progress or complete? - Yes
- How long did the AI review take? - ~8 minutes (maybe because we moved a lot of files, though with minimal changes)
- Did the summary comment posted by the AI reviewer make sense? - Yes
- If you added custom AI rules, were they accounted for in the review? - We didn't add custom AI rules
- Would you trust this AI reviewer on real PRs after this test? - Yes, with caution (as with others)
- What made you smile?
- The reviewer was aware that we are testing it :D
- The reviewer was aware that we are testing it :D
- What felt frustrating or broken?
- When AI reviewer flags issues, you can't navigate directly to the files in the editor (as with the link checker, for example)
- On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the overall quality of the AI reviewer?
- 9/10
- Are there any additional notes you would like to share?
- N/A